Welcome to the Treehouse Community

Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.

Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.

Start your free trial

Python Object-Oriented Python Inheritance Super!

Posted by Megan Moeller
Megan Moeller
5,167 Points

This question seems to be bugged/ it won't let you type in the right answer and doesn't provide useful feedback at all.

This should be the answer based on the video (and based on the question): class Inventory: def init(self): self.slots = []

def add_item(self, item):
    self.slots.append(item)

class SortedInventory(Inventory): def init(self): super().init(self) def add_item(self, item): super().add_item(item)

But doesn't appear to work, and gives you useless feedback, so it's impossible to move forward (though found alternative answers on google where people fudged the code to allow them to make it through)

inventory.py 
class Inventory:
    def __init__(self):
        self.slots = []

    def add_item(self, item):
        self.slots.append(item)

class SortedInventory(Inventory):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__(self)
    def add_item(self, item):
        super().add_item(item)

1 Answer

Steven Parker
Steven Parker
231,269 Points
Steven Parker
Steven Parker
231,269 Points

I assume you're working on Task 2.

When calling methods with "super", you don't pass "self" as an argument. You correctly omitted that when calling "add_item" but you have it when calling "__init__".

Also, overriding __init__ isn't necessary here and can be omitted entirely.