Welcome to the Treehouse Community
Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.
Start your free trialPatrick Akera
492 PointsNameError: name 'avalaible' is not defined
This is too confusing for me. "I think it's time for a snack. Luckily I have a string full of types of ice cream sundaes. Unluckily, they're all in one string and the string has semi-colons in it too.
Use .split() to break the available string apart on the semi-colons (;). Assign this to a new variable sundaes."
in this case, "available" is already defined? i thought it would be as simple as: sundaes = available.split(";")? it seems everything i've tried so far isn't correct
2 Answers
Kevin Faust
15,353 Pointsyou already have the answer... sundaes = available.split(";") . and yes "available" is already defined
available = "banana split;hot fudge;cherry;malted;black and white"
Chris Freeman
Treehouse Moderator 68,441 PointsIf I read the title of your post correctly, the issue is spelled out (bad pun!):
NameError: name 'avalaible' is not defined
The error is a typo: avaLAIble, should be avaILAble
Patrick Akera
492 Pointsyeh, i realised this after a few other attempts. face palm! thank you.
Patrick Akera
492 PointsPatrick Akera
492 PointsThanks Kevin. That is the unfortunate problem, i keep getting an error that says " 'available' is not defined". which is really confusing me because i've crossed reference my code and it seems to be correct :/
Kevin Faust
15,353 PointsKevin Faust
15,353 Pointsyea thats weird. when i open the challenge, the "available" variable is already defined