Welcome to the Treehouse Community

Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.

Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.

Start your free trial

JavaScript JavaScript Array Iteration Methods Combining Array Methods Chaining Array Methods

challenge following this track

Not sure why this is setting each member of displayYears to null.

   const years = [1989, 2015, 2000, 1999, 2013, 1973, 2012];
   let displayYears;

   // displayYears should be: ["2015 A.D.", "2013 A.D.", "2012 A.D."]
   // Write your code below

   displayYears = years
       .filter(year => year > 2000) 
       .map (year => {
           year = year.toString();
           year += " A.D.";
           }
         );

I originally was trying year = year.toString() + " A.D.";

4 Answers

Hi Rick!

Because your filter statement is one line, you don't need a return keyword in the arrow function, but because the map function is more than one line (in curly braces), you do.

This should work/pass:

const years = [1989, 2015, 2000, 1999, 2013, 1973, 2012];
let displayYears;

// displayYears should be: ["2015 A.D.", "2013 A.D.", "2012 A.D."]
// Write your code below

displayYears = years.filter(year => year > 2000)
    .map(year => {
        year = year.toString();
        year += " A.D.";
        return year; // This was missing, map wasn't returning anything (hence Nullness!?!)
    });

I hope that helps.

Stay safe and happy coding!

I went back to my original attempt at using string interpolation that I failed at prior to trying concatenation.

I realized I left off the return statement, and this was my same problem with the code above.

They both work after this fix. But I also saw in the next video that I could dispense with the brackets and expression after the => and just provide the return value there.

Sorry, just noticed your comment...

My bad... LOL

Thanks for the response, though!